Search

The Fourth Reich: Part III

Updated: Nov 16

Thus far, we have looked at a number of different aspects regarding the final human kingdom coming upon the earth. In part one, we addressed the globalist’s schemes they are planning for the world in the coming decade. In part two, we looked at the reawakening of European leaders to once again, take on the mantel of a global superpower. In both, we addressed this mystery of lawlessness that seems to become more pervasive by the day. Today, we will look at the ideology and belief systems for how they take us from where we are today, to where will be in just a few short years.


Opportunism


Nothing screams opportunity faster or louder than a crisis. We’ve had a number of well-known government leaders who echoed those same sentiments on any number of occasions. What’s even better than a crisis, is an artificially manufactured crisis, where those who initiate it can control the messaging for it. We would call this a “false flag” event.


Some of the more famous false flag events include the Gulf of Tonkin (validated US involvement in Vietnam), and COINTELPRO, which involved the FBI infiltrating and smearing famous political activists (such as MLK) and journalists over the years, to discredit them. More recent examples of FBI infiltration and agitation include the 2020 FBI initiated kidnapping attempt on Michigan Governor Whitmer, and the FBI initiated January 6th, 2021 storming of Capitol Hill. These and other highly questionable and still as of yet unresolved tragedies such as the 2012 Sandy Hook and the 2017 Las Vegas mass shootings have become anti-conservative lightning rods for gun-control activists and leftists.


Side Note: Warning signs of false flag events


This can be tricky because not all terrorist attacks or mass shootings are false flags. Some are legitimately the work of deranged people. However, as the world continues to become more unhinged, technology advances, and information fatigue quickly wears down the public, a false flag is an effective way for the government to push certain preordained narratives. A false flag event generally has two or more of these tell-tale signs


~Prepacked official narrative with convenient culprit immediately available


~Conversely, conflicting eye-witness reports can also be used to destroy or discredit official narrative


~Conspicuous police and/or federal military or law enforcement training drills conveniently occur on the day of and very near the attack itself


~Ask yourself this question-could the tragic event be leveraged to invoke emotions like fear or patriotism, in order to produce agreement around a formerly controversial initiative? (ex. Patriot Act)


~Cui Bono? This is Latin for who benefits? If an official narrative for an event has obvious domestic and geopolitical advantages for a government or corporation


~Culprit in mass shootings and bombings efficiently and effectively kills large numbers of people with little to no experience in either handling firearms or bomb making

~Culprit either dies from "self-inflicted gunshot wound" or is assassinated shortly after capture (drugged or suicided)


~Key evidence gets destroyed, goes missing, or remains classified forever


~Culprit leaves a 'manifesto' that can be used to push a political narrative


~Culprit has no motive (what you would call a patsy or fall guy)

However, the 2nd Amendment was not the only constitutional right under assault in recent years. As of 2018, the First Amendment pillar began to appear quite wobbly as social media oligarchs, such as Facebook and Twitter, began increasingly censoring, shadow banning, and outright banning conservative voices to include the President of the United States. The current “crisis” is providing ample reasons for corporate and government leadership to increasingly clamp down on free speech, freedom to assemble, and freedom of religion. This Chinese-styled censorship will not end with political conservatives, but with anyone who speaks out against the state-sanctioned, politically correct narrative propaganda.


Enter Socialism


Socialism is a term most would immediately recognize as being the antithesis of free-market capitalism. It has a long track record of failure everywhere it has been tried, and yet, there are those who are determined to keep trying it anyway thinking, next time we will get it right. So before we go any further, let’s take an oversimplified and perhaps comical review of the basic definitions of socialism, fascism, communism, and capitalism using the “cow method.”


  • Fascism – You have two cows. The government takes both, hires you to take care of them, and sells you the milk.

  • Communism – You have two cows. Your neighbors help take care of them [maybe] and you share the milk.

  • Socialism [Share the Wealth]: You have two cows. The government takes one of them and gives it to your neighbor.

  • Capitalism – You have two cows. You sell one and buy a bull. Your herd multiplies, and the economy grows. You sell them and retire on the income. (Source)


Essentially, any political ideology that minimizes the right to individual liberty, the right of ownership of private property, or forbids entrepreneurship, and then transfers those rights to an elite governing authority (e.g., a king, president, parliament, fuhrer, dictator, committee, party officials, etc.), is a form of socialism. Now when we talk about the differences in all these systems (aside from capitalism), we are really getting into the finer points of what distinguishes them from each other in how and to what extent they limit your freedoms. Aside from capitalism, they are all forms of collectivism.


Collectivism really just means you no longer own your own things, but must share them (either with a community or the state), and you have no voice or recourse in the matter. Some of the finer points include: how flexible the system is, i.e. does it allow for some forms of capitalist endeavors inside the system (ex. socialist democracy)? Is it an absolute top-down state control of everything (monarchism or communism)? Does the government enforce the law through a bureaucracy, or at the end of the barrel of a gun?


Given Over to Leftism


But back to the fundamental question of how are we getting here? Has everyone just collectively forgotten that these recent government vaccine mandates (via executive order) are completely unconstitutional? Well, another stage of this mystery of lawlessness is the process of being given over by God to a debased mind (Romans 1:18-31). Part of being given over is the replacement of rational thought, for subjective and emotion-based reasoning. This is when the public (writ large) no longer care about truth or facts; they only care about perception and emotions. For example, Trump Derangement Syndrome.


We talked in Part 1 about how the Great Reset was just a code word for a UN agenda to push global authoritarianism. But why would anyone want that? Why would anyone want more government control over their lives? Why would anyone want more government monitoring every word they say or type? Why would anyone want a government to tell them what they could eat, what they could buy, or where they could travel or live? I mean, with over 94M people killed in the 20th century by their own governments, we (the people) should be very skeptical about anything a government says about anything.


Well, if you're given over to a debased mind, you no longer see black and white anymore...everything is just shades of gray. Up until the 21st century, it was primarily only the hardcore leftists and the really naïve who wanted more government control. For whatever reasons, they bought into the lie that the bigger the government the more said government was going to be able to provide them with peace and safety. In other words, people were conditioned to accept a “nanny-state.” As Benjamin Franklin once wisely put, those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.


Not even the perpetually stoned and free-love hippies (circa Woodstock) wanted more government. However, in a twisted turn of fate, many of those same hippies who were happy to throw eggs and chant "baby killer" at returning Vietnam vets in the airports, are now the same politicians advocating for total COVID lockdowns and censorship of conservatives on social media platforms.


Socialism, in varying degrees, is an economic/political ideology that offers to provide a temporary safety by taking all the risks out of living, dying, and commerce (liberty), and putting it squarely into the hands of a government that will never relinquish control. And because people don’t willingly give up their freedoms, they have to be coerced into giving them up. This is why a crisis is such a golden opportunity for governments to expand their authority.


  • Want less terrorism, just give up a little more of your privacy and we will stop terrorist attacks.

  • Want less extreme weather, just give up the idea of owning your own house or land, quit driving vehicles, quit eating meat, and stop heating/cooling your home, pay more taxes, and we can stop the crazy weather.

  • Want fewer pandemics, just take this experimental DNA-altering drug, and this US-funded, manmade pandemic will go away.

Of course, they don’t phrase it that way, but that is the way the Fifth Column mainstream media always portrays it. They portray it that way because they have been bought and paid for by big government, big pharma, and deep state entities who want to control the messaging of a crisis, in order to control its outcome. They want to replace personal liberty and freedom, with state-sanctioned, socialist handouts.

Why do you think they are working so hard to dismantle and discredit the US Constitution and its founders? I said in the summer of 2020, these radicals rioting in the streets might start with the tearing down of statues of Confederate generals, but it won’t end there. They need to paint and discredit the US founders as old white, colonialist, slave owners, to help them discredit the constitution the founders wrote. They need to discredit the founders, because the founders knew one basic principle of human nature: power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.


As I said before, socialism works in varying degrees. Understandably, there are nuances and differences say, between German Nazism (National Socialism), Italian Fascism, and Soviet Communism. But these differences, when you strip away all the gish gallop, are really about government control over their populations. There are varying degrees a nation or government will use to enforce its control over its population. But whether we are talking about liberalism, democratic socialism, socialism, fascism, or communism, all of these fall under the big umbrella of leftism. They all operate under the same false pretense of making things more “equal.” In a way, they are correct.


Socialism is the Big Lie of the twentieth century. While it promised prosperity, equality, and security, it delivered poverty, misery, and tyranny. Equality was achieved only in the sense that everyone was equal in his or her misery. Mark J. Perry, 1995


Again, the 20th century is rife with examples of how socialism (in all its various shades), has utterly failed every time. The only difference between say Chinese communism (under Mao), and National Socialism (under Hitler), was Hitler added a racial component to his political ideology (Aryanism), and Mao didn’t. They were still both brutal, totalitarian governments that essentially controlled everything.


Speaking of race-based government policies, it seems like we've come full circle in the 21st century with the return to a pre-civil rights ear as the US government-funded Critical Race Theory, Black Lives Matter (the activist movement- not the sentiment), quota systems, intersectionality, social justice, and other race-based initiatives are being mandated at the state, federal, and even corporate levels.


Now, underlying socialism is a tenet of Marxist philosophy called divide and conquer. How you divide the differing classes of people up, depends upon where you are (the one instigating it), or what your goals happen to be. If you are an outsider, looking to overthrow a government or regime, you pit the people against the government (ex. proletariat vs. the bourgeois).


If you are already in power and fear losing it, you pit the people against each other (i.e., create victim classes) in order to weaken them as a whole. What we have seen in the US over the past sixty years is the latter, where Catholics are against Protestants, republicans are pitted against democrats, blacks are pitted against whites, whites against Asians, gays vs. straights, rich vs. poor, vaccinated vs. unvaccinated, etc. This has proven to be a very effective tactic in a nation that prides itself on being a melting pot, especially by the summer of 2020. It is proving to be even more effective as the federal mandatory vaccine mandates are kicking in.


But who are those who are promoting this socialism?


Globalists. They’ve tried socialism at the state and regional level, only to see it fail. Now, they think the only way they can achieve their theoretical globalist utopia of new world order is to create an overarching global government. Things like individual freedoms, personal privacy, private ownership, freedom of religion, are all things that will be stamped out like a bag full of flaming poo. In order to get this done though, they HAVE to remove the United States from being the world superpower, and the only to do that is to dismantle the US Constitution. Once they do that, the US will shatter into a thousand tiny tribes who are both too busy fighting each other, as well as too fragmented to unite, to stop what’s coming.


Conclusion


Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are of God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world. By this you know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God, and every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the Antichrist, which you have heard was coming, and is now already in the world. 1 John 4:1-4


A debased mind is one that can no longer reason or be reasoned with. Rational thought goes out the window, and everything becomes subjective, so much so, facts and truth, are merely malleable opinions that can change like the wind. This is why those with debased minds, think gender is fluid, and socialism actually works…despite the obvious evidence to the contrary. But the root cause of this being given over is the denial of who Christ really is.


Once you deny that Jesus is the Christ and that He is God come in the flesh, Satan can twist your thinking to whatever he deems fit. Now, how does this all fit into the context that God created governments as a force for good (Gen. 9:5-6, Rom. 13:1-7)? History tells us that human government has rarely worked out as a purely benevolent force primarily because they eventually become corrupt because men are corrupt. Nevertheless, the more tyrannical a government becomes, the more the people cry out to God for salvation and mercy, thus God still gets the glory. A good example would be what the early church had to endure through ten Roman emperors (Nero to Diocletian). Historically, the more persecuted the Church became, the more the Gospel of Jesus Christ spread like wildfire.

So how does a free-market, freedom-loving, constitutional republic trade all that liberty in for godless totalitarianism? One is given over to a debased mind. How does one achieve a debased mind? Rejecting Christ by rejecting the Holy Spirit’s draw to come to saving faith. When enough Christians in a nation stop becoming the salt and light in their communities, and enough of the citizenry deny that Jesus is the Christ, then that nation will begin to embrace the spirit of antichrist. Once that happens, the mystery of lawlessness will begin to spread like cancer in the national body and the people will begin to lose their ability to use reason and common sense.


We know the Bible states that the final government that comes to power, will ultimately and iron-fistedly impose its political/economic/religious will over the entire world (on pain of death). We also know that it will be able to enforce this absolute control through technology (i.e., the Mark of the Beast). Thus, we should be able to rightly deduce that this final government, will be some form of socialistic, technocracy, that is a hybrid of both monarchism (the Beast will declare himself a god with divine right to rule) and will implement communistic measures (absolute brutality) to maintain its control.


Instead of using race or ethnicity as the main segregator between the haves and have nots, it will all come down to whether or not one has received this mysterious Mark of the Beast (Rev. 13:16-18). If you have the mark, then you will enjoy the full rights of citizenship, complete with access to buy and sell, rent a home, access healthcare, etc. If you don’t have the mark, you will be cut off from every conceivable system and cast out as a leper to either starve or have your head cut off.

While I don’t subscribe to the idea that these present-day vaccine mandates are the Mark of the Beast, I will say that the state-sanctioned narrative appears to be a form of both conditioning and desensitizing the masses for when the mark does come. Right now, both government and private corporations, are all bowing to the ever-shifting narrative that if you don’t receive the shots/jabs and get your vaccine passports, then you will lose your job. Not only will you lose your job, but you deserve to lose your job for being “anti-establishment.” Not only that, but increasingly, the “unvaxxed” will lose access to travel by plane, shop, or eat out at various establishments, as well as attend a school or other educational venues. And not even just you, but your children as well.


And a growing population, either by choice or by force, are succumbing to the pressure to comply. That is when and why people trade liberty for bondage. As the Roman historian Tacitus once wisely stated, the more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. And ours is a nation drowning with all kinds of both legal and illegal laws. People then mistake temporary laws for moral foundations, not realizing that laws can be written to justify just about any action (ex. Roe v. Wade, ). That is what we are seeing today, especially in younger generations (Millennials and Gen-Z) who have come to see the law of the land as a substitute for moral foundations. Thus, they have come full circle in the cycle of nations.


From bondage to spiritual faith.

From spiritual faith to great courage.

From courage to liberty.

From liberty to abundance.

From abundance to selfishness.

From selfishness to complacency.

From complacency to apathy.

From apathy to dependency.

From dependency back again into bondage.


--Sir Alex Fraser Tyler, Scottish jurist and historian


The globalists are ideological leftists, economic socialists, and are antichrist in spirit. They have spent the last century dumbing down the population through political correctness, revisionist history, and antichristian science and philosophies.

They have spent the last century taking God out of schools and government. They have weaponized the media (the Fifth Column) and Hollywood to both desensitize and propagandize the population with their wickedness and antichrist messaging. Should the Lord tarry, and at the rate we (humankind collectively) are retrograding, I too wonder…


…when the Son of Man comes, will He really find faith on the earth?” Luke 18:8


to be continued.

1,122 views8 comments

Recent Posts

See All